|
September 14th.,
2005
UNPD and ECLA
Indicators
Summary:
-
Chávez announces
the imminent crumbling of The U. S. Empire.
-
Success and
difficulties of The Revolution.
-
According to
UNPD and ECLA, inequality, extreme poverty and
malnourishment have increased.
-
Severe charges
vs. key regime policies.
-
Venezuela is ill
placed in the analysis of achievements and failures
of Latin American democracy.
-
Precarious
economic freedom places Venezuela at the level of
Zimbabwe and Congo.
-
Government
collects 150 million-x-day in petrodollars but
private investment is the lowest in the last 55
years.
-
Military
takeover and expropriation of industrial facilities
without due process.
-
Official
spokespeople affirm it is the start of XXI Century
Socialism.
-
The military
control facilities while Cuban technicians evaluate
infrastructures.
-
The Age of
Intervention begins with the appearance of
confiscation.
-
Official media
speaks of the President’s Project to intervene 700
“non-productive” enterprises and over 1,000 with a
sluggish rhythm of production.
-
A farm is
occupied by the military: according to Chávez, it
belonged to his great grandfather, a guerrilla known
as Maisanta.
-
There is an
international fatigue for The Chávez Case. The
decline in oil prices shall bring the demise of the
last Caribbean Cartoon Opera.
On 6 Tuesday, the gathering launching The Caribbean Oil
Accord, took place in Jamaica: AP flashed the photo of
Fidel and Chávez with exulted faces. Nearby there were
signs of trouble which did not murk the smile of the
rulers. PETROCARIBE was a reality and Chávez –as the
acknowledged regional leader- was calling for a
definition of strategies towards the imminent crumbling
of he U. S. Empire.
Oil diplomacy reaps success but the external image of
The Revolution continues to experience discomfort.
Official spokespeople express disgust on recent UNPD-ECLA
(United Nations Population and Development-Economic
Commission for Latin America) reports, according to
which, HDI [Human Development Indexes] had declined in
Venezuela while improving in most countries of the
region. When analyzing the status of millennium
objectives, Venezuela is last and it seems the goal is
unattainable for 2015. Inequality, extreme poverty and
malnourishment have increased. Opposition and
independent analysts claim that HDI decline is a severe
charge vs. key regime policies. HDI cover three
dimensions: income; education and health. Oil prices
and demanding fiscal reforms increased government
revenues into fairy tale levels. The whole official
discourse is centered in its social policy and the claim
of spectacular achievements in health, education and
welfare, as a result of missions. In reply to official
discontent, Caracas UNDP Office issued a press release
stating that The 2005 Report covers data through 2003.
UNDP left officialdom dissatisfied because its 2004-2005
figures do not essentially change its indicators.
The International Center for Public Policy (ICPP)
reported development indicators of democracy in Latin
America, which were also disturbing for the regime. The
ICPP Report shows that Venezuela is last on this count.
The regional mean was 4.84 while Venezuela is 2.58.
ICPP aims at showing achievements and failures in the
realization of democratic values in the region. In
either aspect Venezuela is ill-placed. Official media
questioned the veracity of UNPD-ECLA Indicators. Those
of ICPP were accused as new slander from Imperialism
vs. The Bolivarian Revolution. The World Index of
Economic Freedom {Canada’s Frazer Institute}got a
similar response.
The Canadian WIFE measures how a country’s policies and
institutions support economic liberties as a premise for
development. It places Venezuela as 124 out of 127
economies researched, at the level of Zimbabwe and
Congo. VEA, -the official daily- reported that
such fallacies would be unmasked by the President at his
UN General Assembly speech.
Economic figures have become fuel in the
officialdom-critics debate. The extreme political
control of The Central Bank and The Office of Statistics
nourishes suspicion of the numbers from each body.
However, neither one hides that between 1999 and 2004,
key social indexes (jobless rate; homes in poverty and
per capita income have not improved. Chávez has already
been enjoying high oil prices for several years: the
government receives 150 million-petrodollars-x-day, but
private investments barely makes 13.8% of the GDP. The
present administration is the one who has least
attracted investments into the country for the past 55
years.
XXI CENTURY SOCIALISM
What has been called The Chávez Effect is easy to
read. Editorial policy of large dailies answers
critical positions but the general information is
objective. Also, mass media feels the weight of The
Muzzle Law and The Damocles Sword of exchange controls;
judicial-fiscal claims and all administrative inspection
procedures always available for intimidation.
El Nacional front page reported the improvement
in Venezuela’s risk qualification due to strong demand
of its emerging debt papers The entire media reported
on the same day that Polar –the main
agro-industrial conglomerate in the country- protested
the military takeover and expropriation, without due
process, of one of its installations. It is a violation
of private property, said the firm’s lawyer, a threat to
any investment purpose. The Minister of Agriculture
replied that the installation was inactive and it was
fair for workers to take it over with National Guard
support. “It is government policy to rescue productive
infrastructures to adapt them to the co-management
model. The New Socialism proposes to guarantee
employment to workers.” The Minister of Popular Economy
maintained it was not an isolated case, “because
government policy, within The New Socialism Model, is
nourishment security.” There was multiple evidence that
installations were operating as a Collection,
Maintenance and Distribution Center for corn produced by
growers in the zone.
That very day, El Nacional reported the
intervention in the State of Monagas, of a Heinz tomato
processing plant. The Minister of Agriculture stated it
was part of a Plan of Intervention and Recuperation of
Animal Husbandry Enterprises to foster endogenous
development while implementing the co-management model.
The media has been following this matter. In the
intervention process, the State Governor formally
surrendered installations to The Army Hunters Brigade
for the military control and management of the plant,
while Cuban technicians evaluate the infrastructure for
its reactivation. A slaughter house was also taken
over. The official media says it is the beginning of
the President’s Project to rescue 700 non-productive
enterprises and over 1000 operating sluggishly. Indeed,
in Aló Presidente (17 July, 2005), in his so
personal style of governing, he ordered the start of the
process: “He who owns a shop, be a shopkeeper, sell it
or we will expropriate it.” Ministers and Governors
heeded his voice. It is reasonable to assume
that entrepreneurs did too. They deem more intelligent
to purchase debt bonuses than to make productive
investments.
FARM TAKEOVER BY THE MILITARY
Together with such measures, The Intervention Program of
Large Animal Husbandry Units was re-started. It was very
controversial at Hato Pińero, internationally
recognized as a Model of Conservationist Agro-Tourism.
Likewise, Charcote, a British-owned old cattle
ranch. In the new stage, the takeover of numerous farms
was announced: at least seven were taken over by the
military. Authorities announced the issuance of
Agro-Letters to peasants for them to occupy these, thus,
fostering endogenous development.
Among occupied farms there is one –La Marqueseńa-
is becoming a scandalous case. The government says they
are wastelands. This contradicts a Chávez statement in
Agustín Blanco’s book Habla El Comandante
(ratified several times in Aló Presidente). He
says La Marqueseńa belonged to his
great-grandfather, a guerrilla known as Maisanta,
who says the President, attempted to rescue his lands.
“Now, I think they belong to the Aspurus” he said.
Members of this family are now being accredited as
legitimate owners and demand the verification of the
excellent operational status of their land. Eduardo
Gómez Sigala –an entrepreneurial leader- has asked The
Supreme Court to say if, in Venezuela, there is or there
is not private property. FEDECÁMARAS demanded
the restitution of legal order and argues that without
acknowledgement of the right of property, the private
sector cannot function, and this entails hunger and
misery. The President repeats that the road is XXI
Century Socialism and calls for a constitutional reform
to channel it within the judicial order. Before a
Chinese visiting commercial delegation, he ratified to
remain in power until 2030. Hours before he had sworn
in his delegates in The National Assembly for elections
in December. No one doubts he’ll have the majority and
that the reform will allow him to stay in power as long
as he wants or can be.
This is the Venezuelan scenario when The UN deals with
Millenium Goals and ICCP questions the forward and
backward pace of democracy in Latin America. When
fatigue begins for The Chávez Case and it is proposed to
await the decline in oil prices so the last curtain may
fall upon the last Cartoon Opera of Caribbean Folklore.
|