|
November 14th.,
2005
Mar Del
Plata Summits
Summary:
-
In
the President of Inter-American Dialogue’s opinion,
Chavez scored a hit in Mar del Plata.
-
“Chavez did not bury
the AFTA, but he managed to put it in the freezer”.
-
Severe diplomatic
conflict between México and Venezuela as a
consequence of Mar del Plata.
-
How far is the
conflict going? Withdrawal of ambassadors so far.
-
Just a few
presidents of the Continent and Europe like Chavez,
but they cultivate his friendship or at least avoid
his enmity.
-
In Mar del Plata,
Fox requested a bilateral meeting with Kirchner and
he denied it because of his busy agenda. The
available time was reserved to Chavez.
-
The version of the
Argentinean journal, Clarín.
-
Michael Shifter
warns that the Latin American trust in U.S. has
evaporated.
-
Chavez considers
that the Venezuelan oil is indispensable for the
northern power.
-
Chavez assumes the
leadership of the radical left and is ready to keep
advancing in the continent, as far as the oil
geopolitics let him.
-
In the intergovernmental meeting
Russia-Venezuela, Chavez regretted the end of the
communist revolution. “Latin America is a Stalingrad
of the ideas now, and it will be what Russia could
not”.
-
The regime accuses
the CIA, FBI and Colombian DAS of participating in
the assassination planning of the attorney Danilo
Anderson.
-
The Attorney
General’s Office suggests that in the planning of
the crime, a Cardinal who is a friend of Benedict
XVI was present.
-
Apathy in front of
parliamentary elections of December 4th.
-
At the last moment,
European Union and OAS observers are allowed.
In our report as of October 28th,
we stated that Mar del Plata’s events were going to be
newsworthy. There were a Summit and an anti-Summit. In
both, Chavez played a fundamental role.
Inter-American Dialogue offered its analysis on
Thursday 10th. In the opinion of this
qualified Center of Studies, Peter Hakim, Chavez scored
a hit. The same has been stated by respectable Latin
American and European analysts. Hakim’s interesting
contribution was the figure he used: A lighting that
illuminated a continent politically and ideologically
divided. Newsweek used another simile. It gave
its cover front to Hurricane Hugo. The Financial
Times titled:
Chavez leads the charge against US. Mar
del Plata must be examined objectively. The meeting of
presidents had the purpose of giving the AFTA a new
breath. Chavez anticipated that the seaside city was
going to be the scenario of the AFTA’s funeral. The
final declaration resembled a funeral card, although Mr.
Shannon, recently appointed as Assistant Secretary of
State, insisted that the corpse was in good health.
Peter Hakim was not that optimistic. Chavez –he said-
did not bury the AFTA, but he managed to put it in the
freezer. Moreover, from now, Chefs of State’s meetings
were Chavez attend may not be held within a privacy
framework. In his program, Hello President of
Sunday 13th, he presented the videos of
meetings held behind closed doors in the IV Summit. He
anticipated that there will be complains from his
continental peers, “but the world has to know the truth,
the continental geopolitics. Those videos show
disagreements between Fox and Kirchner. He also
broadcasted unknown fragments of certain Lula’s
intervention, which in Chavez’s opinion was “such a
great speech”. México claimed as illegal the
broadcasting of such videos, because the meetings were
private and respecting this there was a previous
agreement.
This is true, but México is Latin
American’s paradigm of prudent and pragmatic diplomacy
in front of the Lieutenant Colonel. Fox said the
Chavez’s intolerance prevented from subscribing the
agreement supported by a solid majority. Chavez answered
him: “President Fox, It is very sad that you acted in
the Summit as a puppy of the empire, as a president who
kneels down before the empire”. It was demanded an
explanation from the Palace of Eagles. The Venezuelan
ambassador was urged to attend to the Mexican
Chancellor’s Office, and he said he had nothing to
explain. Secretary Derbez expressed he was not satisfied
and called repeatedly to his Venezuelan peer, Alí
Rodriguez, who finally answered and a few hours later
issued a statement considering this matter over. In
Hello President on Sunday 13th, Chavez
insulted Fox again, addressing him threatening phrases.
The Mexican Government demanded formal apologies. How
far is the conflict going? There will be surely
withdrawal of ambassadors, but the Mexican government
denies the possibility of breaking off diplomatic
relations. Between Fox and Chavez there were never
empathy, but Venezuela is a very important trade partner
for Mexico. Just a few presidents of the Continent and
Europe like Chavez, but they cultivate his friendship or
at least avoid his enmity.
For Kirchner, apart from actual or
pretended ideological affinities, Chavez is his Santa
Claus. Fox questioned the host’s quality, and Kirchner
answered that his duty was not to make a good impression
to the visitants. Strictly speaking, the short circuit
began when Fox requested a bilateral meeting and the
Argentinean president denied the possibility because of
his “busy agenda”. Effectively, the time available was
been reserved to Chavez. Apart from the public act to
subscribe new cooperation agreements, where they
exchanged compliments, Kirchner had requested to Chavez
a private meeting to solve a situation that Venezuela
had with the Argentinean group Techint, whose iron and
steel company (Sidor) was in the commander’s target to
be controlled by the State again.
The businessman Paolo Rocca (head
officer of Techint), and Cristina Kirchner, whose
campaign for Senator, according to the journal Clarín,
was financed by Rocca, attended that meeting. According
to the sources of Clarín, for Rocca the meeting was very
good. “The commitment of Techint with Venezuela was
reconfirmed, and points to the long term”.
Continental
Leader with a Project
The other Summit, the Summit of the Peoples, confirmed
Chavez as the leader of the Latin American radical left.
At least Chavez assumes that role. Fidel Castro and the
radical left support him and need him. The lieutenant
colonel, with his aggressive rhetoric, has achieved to
capitalize the regional discomfort against Washington. A
lucid mind, Michael Shifter, warned in the meeting of
Inter-American Dialogue that the Latin American trust
toward U.S. has evaporated. It has also in other spaces,
we may note. The vote in the United Nations against
Cuba embargo was a diagnosis of Bush’s foreign policy.
U.S. was accompanied by Israel, Palau and Marshall
Islands. Micronesia abstained. Bush is unlikely, in his
current domestic and international circumstances, to pay
attention to what most of the elites that influence him
still consider the backyard. This is Chavez’s bet, and
his conviction that Venezuelan exports and reserves of
oil are still indispensable for the United States.
Upon concluding the Summits, Chavez declared that in Mar
del Plata began a new history for Latin America. True or
not, Chavez believes it, and he thinks or intents to
keep advancing as far as the oil, instrument of the
revolutionary geopolitics, let him. In his Hello
President remembered that he has been taking about
the axis Caracas-Brasilia-Buenos Aires for years, as an
alliance to the South American liberation from the
northern Empire. “We integrate to Mercosur to contribute
the political experience of the Venezuelan process.
Times have changed. Now we have the awareness of the
peoples on our side”. In the broadcasting of the videos
of the private meeting of the IV Summit he highlighted
the phases that he liked the most from Lula’s speech,
who he called “my compadre”, and reproached Tabare
Vasquez due to his conciliatory tone.
Chavez chairs the Andean Community of Nations, but he
affirms that Venezuela has nothing to look for in the
CAN. However, he wants to purchase oil infrastructure
from Colombia, according to the report of the magazine
Semana. PDVSA intends to bid in the auctions of
Cartagena and Ecogas refineries, distributors of 40% of
the gas that this country consumes. The Bolivian
president candidate, Jorge Quiroga, reports Chavez’s
interference in the president elections, where abundant
petrodollars try to ensure the Evo Morales’ victory. In
Ecuador he is cautious, due to the situation with
Gutiérrez and Palacios’ resistance to cooperation
offers.
In Peru he observes and waits, confident that Lourdes
Flores will not be Toledo’s successor. In Nicaragua he
plays with Daniel Ortega and in México he hopes that the
new nuances in Lopez Obrador’s words be in form but not
in content. Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney General,
just pointed out that the Venezuelan revolution is the
most important event in the XXI century so far. How far
is this situation going? The answers are varied. In the
recent intergovernmental meeting Russia-Venezuela,
before the Vice Prime Minister Zhukov, Chavez regretted
the end of the communist revolution. “Latin America is a
Stalingrad of the ideas now, and it will be what Russia
could not”.
Caribbean
melodrama and elections
There is little interest about the
elections of December 4th. The public
opinion is distracted with the last soup opera mounted
by the government. The arrest of Patricia Poleo, the
director of El Nuevo País, a strong opposition
journal; Nelson Mezerhane, a businessman and
stockholder of the TV news channel Globovisión;
the son of the anti-Castrist activist Salvador Romaní,
and two generals, one active and one retired, was
ordered by a tribunal. They are charged for the
intellectual authorship of the attorney Danilo
Anderson’s assassination. The Attorney General’s Office
presents as witness an alleged Colombian doctor who
affirms that he was present in several meetings between
the accused ones and FBI, CIA and DAS agents, aimed to
plan the assassination. DAS issued a statement
certifying that according to the data base of the
National Registry, the record of said witness includes
impersonation, fraud, use of false documents, and he has
been under arrest for usurping the medical profession.
The new version of the Attorney’s Office, suggests that
in the meetings to arrange the assassination, the
Cardinal Castillo Lara, who held high posts in The
Vatican and is a personal friend of the Pope Benedict
XVI, was present. The scandal feeds the indifference of
Venezuelan voters.
The apathy is understood, because
this election is a new plebiscite made by an autocratic
and almighty president, in front of an frighten
population, an impoverished mass induced to vote in
exchange for benefits, and an electoral arbitrator
controlled by the regime, which up to this point, has
not even made available the voter registration.
Political parties are tolerated as a facade of
revolution in democracy, but carrying out their typical
activity of opposition is impeded or restricted. Minimal
conditions to allow participation has been pointlessly
requested so far: to count the votes issued by the
voting machines, eliminate electronic books, publish the
electoral record and limit military interference in the
vote.
The European Union and OAS achieved
a last-minute authorization to send observation
missions; with an excellent intention and the best
purposes. But, like Ruben Perina, chef of OAS’s mission
said, they do not come to qualify or to disqualify. But
it is expected that his report answers the following
question: ¿Were Venezuelan elections abided by the
patterns included in the Inter-American Democratic
Charter and the International Electoral Law endorsed by
the European Union?
|