|
July 14th.,
2006
MERCOSUR ARMED FORCES
ABSTRACT:
-
With the Presidents of Paraguay,
Argentina and Bolivia, Chavez foretold that MERCOSUR
will have a common defense organization.
-
Latin American Parliament calls for a
Seminar about the military as an element of
integration.
-
Heinz Dieterich, a Mexican German who
is considered the ideological mentor of the Lieutenant
Colonel, will expose his theories about the need for
an armed arm of MERCOSUR.
-
The “oil diplomacy” conquered the
support of the Latin American Parliament, as well as
of Uruguay.
-
On
July 5, the soldiers paraded exhibiting the new AK
assault rifles and the Caracas sky was cut through the
powerful air force available to Chavez, including the
Russian Sukhoi.
-
Construction of arms manufacturers,
Russian fighter planes, artillery helicopters, tanks,
military transportation planes, rapid launches,
Tucanos, submarines constitute the arms deal acquired.
-
The system is designed for a
conventional war. Against who?
-
Pre
totalitarian signs and ideology of thought are
starting to show upon the militaristic, authoritarian
and autocratic scenario.
-
The Catholic Church speaks up.
-
The
Episcopal Conference denounces intolerance to
criticism, persecution and discrimination for
ideological reasons, political prisoners, acts against
the autonomy of the universities and liberty of
expression.
-
It states that in the electoral year,
uncertainty, fear and distrust define the collective
state of mind. That it is necessary to rescue the
trust in the vote and the achievement of an electoral
process politically and ethically irreproachable.
-
Keller & Associates, in its last
study, found that once again, the country is divided
in equal parts, between pro Chavez and those against
him, in a scenario that had disappeared since the
Recall.
MERCOSUR ARMED FORCES
Invitations from the Latin American Parliament are being
distributed for a Seminar regarding Regional Security,
Integration and Armed Forces, to be celebrated in the
Polytechnic University of the Military next coming
week. According to the program, the granting of
academic category to the integration of the South Armed
Forces will be proposed. It is an idea on which Chavez
insists, that obtained ample broadcasting when he
reiterated it last July 5, in the imposing military
parade effected to commemorate the anniversary of the
Independence. By his side were the Presidents of
Bolivia, Paraguay and Argentina, who joined in the
applause of the Generals that occupied spaces close to
the Presidential Tribune, when Chavez foretold that
MERCOSUR will count with common defense organization,
wherein we will fusion the armed forces of our countries
with our own strategy. Chavez stated as a praising
sign of his proposal, the participation of Argentinean
military in the parade. In the Seminar, the issue of
the South Atlantic Treaty Organization (OTAS in
Spanish), will be presented by Admiral Cabrera, who is a
member of the highest Presidential military hierarchy.
General Quintero, Commander of the Reserves, will talk
about the Venezuelan experience regarding the
paramilitary forces being organized. General Lopez,
Inspector General, second in command in the Ministry of
Defense, will talk about the thesis regarding the
military as an element of regional integration.
His theories about new threats from the Empire and the
need for a regional power block will be the contribution
to the OTAS Project of Heinz Dieterich, a Mexican-German
teacher who is considered as the ideological mentor of
the revolution. He is one of the main collaborators of
the electronic magazine Rebelión, wherein he
tries to conciliate Marxism-Leninism with the XXI
Century Socialism preached by Chavez. He was present in
the July 5 parade, and upon praises towards him, he
affirmed that the exhibition of tanks, rifles, combat
planes, regular troops, militia and synchronized popular
masses, correspond to the war scenarios offered by the
Revolution. In the program enclosed by the Latin
American Parliament to the Invitation, the participation
of Ecuadorian General René Vargas is announced.
Uruguay’s Ambassador, Geronimo Cardozo is in charge of
the issue of the National Armed Forces and the Latin
American Integration. Besides the military parade,
another significant act of July 5 had Parliament as its
scenery, totally integrated by pro Government Deputies,
wherein President Kirchner, in order speech,
acknowledged that Venezuela enjoys a total democracy, a
necessary condition for its inclusion in MERCOSUR. The
Argentinean President’s sentence was not a surprise,
since he has never hidden his identification with
Chavez. What is surprising is that the “oil diplomacy”
has conquered the support of the Latin American
Parliament and of a country with such a civil tradition
as that of Uruguay, in the polemic issue of military
integration, as an armed arm of MERCOSUR.
MILITARY, ARMS AND SOLE THOUGHT
Every day, there are many and more ostentatious
militarization and arms race manifestations. On July 5,
thousands of soldiers, parading before Chavez, who was
made accompanied by General Mijail Timofievich
Kalashnikov, creator of the assault rifle AK, exhibited
the first shipment of 100,000 rifles acquired from
Russia. The grazing flight of a Russian plane opened the
parade. It was the presentation of the 24 Sukhoi 30
bought by Chavez, who made proud comments to Kirchner,
Evo Morales and Nicanor Duarte about the equipment that
cut through the Caracas sky; the Skytruck fleet,
Broncos, Super King 200, Hercules, Mirage, F16 and a
707 Boeing to supply fuel in the air to the Russian
planes.
Pursuant to the information available, the negotiation
of the Russian assault rifles include the installation
of two manufacturers of these arms and its ammunitions,
which will also be available for production, some 50,000
a year. With Russia, it has also been agreed to buy
artillery helicopters, bullet proof cars with light
canons and Antonov planes for military transportation.
The buy from Spain includes planes for the Air Force and
rapid launches for the Naval Force. With Brazil, there
are deals to acquire Tucanos and the government is
requesting quotes for submarines. Chavez promised that
with the next shipment of Russian rifles, he would arm
15,000 youngsters from the Francisco de Miranda Front,
formed in Cuba, in accordance with the model of the
social fighters School that works in Havana. In a
meeting at the Poliedro, on June 29, he stated that to
date, there are another 5,000 in the Island, training
physically, ideologically and militarily, and that
he would send another 5,000 when the others come back.
The Regime repeats that it buys weapons for a defensive
war against the danger of an invasion effected or
propitiated by the United States. Notwithstanding, the
experts coincide in that all the system is designed for
a conventional war. Against who?
The leftist pre candidate Teodoro Petkoff, declared that
pre totalitarian signs are starting to show upon the
militaristic, authoritarian and autocratic scenario.
Nationalization is expanding, covering sports, culture,
science, non government organizations, particularly
those dedicated to the defense of human rights. The
autonomy of the universities, television and radio
chains are in the objective of the political control
cannons, and the Armed Forces is a politicized
institution, at the service of Chavez and his party.
Petkoff affirms that the announcement from Minister
Istúriz of modeling the teachers and students, since
they are small children, in the ideology of the
revolution, would lead to create submissive, non
critical and obedient citizens to the political
designations of the government.
Similar statements were made by the Episcopal Conference
Assembly: Venezuela witnesses with astonishment and
moral rejection, the promotion of a war climate and the
militarization of society, amongst other things, by the
creation of civil militias. The Catholic hierarchs
criticized the training of use of arms in the young and
adolescent, and exhorted the diminishing of the arms
expense. The family, education and society issue
deserved a special chapter. They signal the danger of
consecrating the state-party monopoly of the education,
as longed in a Bill project, and they reject politics in
education to turn teachers into agents of this doctrine,
as well as the exclusion of religious education to
children in public schools.
THE ELECTORAL
SCENARIO
The document from the Episcopal Conference considers as
indispensable that the government precise its proposal
of the XXI Century Socialism. It signals facts that may
allow a deduction of trying to impose a sole thought:
questioning of those who denounce scarce attention to
the most urgent problems, intolerance to criticism,
persecution and discrimination on account of ideological
reasons, political prisoners and criminal accusations
without any grounds, accusing the opposition of crimes
such as treason, accusations against the autonomy of the
universities and freedom of expression. For the Church,
the International Cooperation Bill will affect the
liberty and activities of NGO´s and constitutes a threat
to pluralism and democratic diversity.
We are in an electoral year, as stated by the document.
The uncertainty, fear and distrust define the collective
state of mind. What will happen in the country? This
is the question that generates anguish and paralysis.
It is necessary to rescue the trust in voting, as a
democratic mechanism to peacefully solve conflicts of
those who think otherwise.
There is an exhortation to the CNE so that the electoral
process be politically and ethically irreproachable,
guaranteeing that the vote may be exercised without fear
of repression and with the assurance that the decision
of the majority will be respected.
The message from the Church was able to collect what
constitutes the essence of the Venezuelan articulation:
that the confrontation and fracture of the society give
way to a path of recuperation of the national concord.
Is this possible? Objectively, the main political
actor, Chavez, gives no sign of a disposition to fair
play in the democratic game. He gives the impression
that he considers the regime structurally consolidated
and grants priority to the affirmation of his leadership
in the world scenario. From July 19 through August 2 he
will travel to Brazil, Argentina, Byelorussia, Russia,
Qatar, Iran and Vietnam. He does not include the visit
to North Korea, which official spokespersons had
justified, and which does not mean that it is excluded,
in absolute terms, given to the frequent change of his
schedule. Chavez seems more interested in the Security
Council than the Presidential elections in December.
Reasonably, since at this point in time, the opposition
keeps debating about the method for selecting a
candidate and the CNE keeps stubborn to the conditions
that would bring transparency and credibility to the
electoral act.
The majority of the polls favor Chavez, but according to
the last survey from Alfredo Keller, a 72% wants the
appearance of leaders that counter weight the
President’s figure. According to Keller, his
investigations differ from other surveys that divide
Chavez followers into a third, and who resent it, and
the so called NOR NOR (nor with Chavez, nor against
him). Keller, in his last study, found that 50% is
declared pro Chavez and 50% is declared against Chavez,
a polarization that disappeared since the Revocation
Recall, and that now appears once again as scenery of an
electoral battle of unpredictable outcome, if there is
credibility in the arbiter and unitary candidacy.
|