|
July 30th.,
2007
The Collapse Of State Oil Business
PDVSA currently finds itself in a state of operational
emergency. This announcement was front page news since
it was made by this company’s Vice-President of
Exploration and Production, thus confirming what has
been long affirmed by national and international
analysts. He attributed the problems to difficulties in
acquiring drills. He acknowledged it would be impossible
to meet with the goal of producing more than 3 million
barrels this year, since of the 191 required active
drills, it is forecasted that the year will end with
only 120, as long as the 5 selected companies install
the 27 which were requested. On the following day,
Rafael Ramírez, the President of PDVSA also made the
front pages, confirming that there is an international
drill shortage and that the solution to this was given
by the President, who instructed him to build the drills
in the country. Ramírez, who became famous last November
when declaring that the company was “red, red”, was
emphatic in affirming that “the united socialist
party of the revolution must be strengthened within the
core of PDVSA.”
This issue with the drills has made it clear that in
order to produce oil, transparent policies, good
management and qualified human resources are required,
principles which were applied when the oil was
nationalized in the 70s. PDVSA, managed by Venezuelans,
acquired high level recognition in the industry’s
management, assumed as a business which was to produce
maximum benefits for public finance. Achieving this was
not so complicated. The nationalized industry assumed as
its own the personnel, technologies and experiences of
the transnational companies. Top executives were
selected by the government, professional credentials
bearing more weight than political tendencies. Internal
and external control mechanisms functioned, among others
National Congress, where all political sectors had
representation and were heard. In consequence, the media
and public opinion were always kept informed and were
vigilant of oil policies.
This transparency has disappeared. There is no reliable
information regarding production and sales. In the
current scandal, caused by internal conflict, it has
been revealed that corruption, thanks to which many top
public officers have obtained extraordinary illicit
enrichments, has been a determining factor in this
company’s falling apart. With regards to management and
human resources, Ramírez explains: PDVSA is red, red,
and its function is to strengthen Chávez’ party.
This operational emergency shows us that this year’s
production and income is very much so below the
government announcements. The Mining Ex-Minister,
Calderón Berti, estimates the current production to be
at 2,380,000 barrels, including transnational companies.
The business lead by transnationals has also come in
descent since the migration of operational agreements to
mixed companies managed by PDVSA. The company has been
forced to issue debt bonds in order to attend to cash
problems and purchase gasoline to satisfy supply
commitments. Respectable experts affirm that if during
the course of the year, sales prices are not
substantially raised (currently US $69) the balance
sheet will reflect net losses. The presumed collapse of
PDVSA is being followed attentively, within and outside
the country, since the oil dollars are the support of
the XXI century socialism Chávez is implementing
internally and trying to export.
THE
DEVIATION OF OIL RESOURCES
“It is impossible to conceive XXI century socialism
without the Venezuelan energetic potential. When many
countries are left without oil, the reserves will be in
Russia, the Middle East and Venezuela, us being in the
first place because in the Orinoco Belt we have the
largest reserve in the planet”, declared Chávez in his
latest Aló, Presidente, in which he dedicated
over three hours to this subject. He declared that PDVSA
is one of the most efficient companies of the world, and
is exporting knowledge and technology, helping Latin
American countries and soon Africa. He affirmed that the
transnationals which left due to the fact that they did
not accept the new conditions, granted PDVSA the chance
to prove that it can extract and improve extra heavy oil
from the Belt, produce sufficient gas for national
consumption and export, and that additionally the
success of national technology for foreign coasts
exploitation is being proven.
It was very clear that he made an effort to detract
attention from all declarations of state oil business
collapse, which was revealed by his collaborators.
Experts rushed to point out that in fact in the Belt
there is an immense reserve of extra heavy oil,
susceptible of being transformed into light oil through
warming and hydrogen injection, in upgraders such as the
Jose complex, established by the transnationals. In
order to produce 600,000 barrels per day, during the
“apertura petrolera” (opening
up the oil sector to private investors) the
investment was of US $17.600 million. Daily production
has fallen to 400,000 barrels, under the new
administration, managed by PDVSA. The company does not
have, nor will it admit it due to political reasons,
technicians with the necessary capabilities and
experience and lacks financing to quadruple current
production in the Belt, as was announced by Chávez. He
declared that for the year 2010, total production will
be of 5 million daily. The countries of the Persian Gulf
which belong to the OPEC, countries which have light
oils and whose oil wells on average have high
production, are carrying out a similar project, for
which they have foreseen an investment of one hundred
thousand million dollars. An investigative reporter
specialized in the oil issue, José Suárez Nuńez, has
just revealed (inner sources of PDVSA), that the company
keeps as confidential a consolidated budget of currency
income summing up to the amount of US $25.8 thousand
million in order to pay indemnifications to
transnational companies which used to operate in the
Belt and to cover presidential promises of foreign aid,
which according to his own announcements are circa US
$100,000 million. The amount revealed by the journalist
represents half the official estimate of oil income for
this year and is greater than intentional reserves. The
financing issue is made worse due to the fact that PDVSA
transfers to the public treasury US $23 per exported
barrel, in accordance with the Budget Law. The
differential is transferred to a rotating fund which is
administered freely by Chávez (FONDEN, National
Development Fund) for social programs and foreign
cooperation. Investors mistrust is worsened by the
climate of insecurity created by declarations in which
the government states its intentions to nationalize all
strategic areas, such as has been done with
telecommunications and electricity.
With regards to gas, Chevron and Statoil quantified the
existence in the Orinoco Delta to be between 12 and 14
thousand million cubic feet, but a liquefying plant is
required that would permit supplying the national market
and exporting the product. The President has just
announced a new filial of PDVSA, Petrogas. In the
Petrocasa inaugural act (one of the eight filials which
PDVSA will have), he said that the South gas main has
“become cold”. He stated that selling gas to the USA
would be a great business, “but we are Bolivarian and
wish to share our riches with friend countries.” He
claims not to understand that Evo sells to Brazil and
Argentina at a much lower price that the one paid by the
USA.
XXI CENTURY SOCIALISM, OIL AND ARMED FORCES
Chávez, upon turning 43, notably extended the period in
which he plans to govern. “Only God will separate me
from this office, and while God wills it I will be here.
The people are God’s voice, and they have the right to
keep a President for as long as they like, may that be
twelve or forty years.” Up until now, the maximum
aspiration which he had expressed had been 2030, date
upon which Venezuela celebrates 200 years since its
separation from the Great Colombia, created by Bolivar.
Immediately after these declarations, he claimed that
a “chavismo (Chávez oriented governing) without Chávez
is pretended, as an aspect of a destabilization attempt
of the revolution.” “I am certain that I must
continue for a few more years at the head of this boat,
and will do so as long as you want it,” he declared,
looking out towards the group of Ministers and top
officers who surrounded him, whose smiling faces were
captured by the cameras of the official TV, among
others, the new sitting officer of Defense.
The martial subject has become a main part of the daily
debate ever since the unforeseen speech of General
Baduel, exiting Minister of Defense, upon rescinding his
office. In this read speech, Baduel said to be a
sympathizer of the XXI century socialism, so long as it
is deeply democratic, with constitutional counterweights
and division of powers. He highlighted the
incompatibility of a modern socialism with autocratic
forms of government. He dedicated a long while to
deliberations regarding the need to create a productive
economy, questioning the distributive model of uncreated
wealth. “Instead of teaching Venezuelans how to generate
wealth through work and effort, they were taught to
request help from the government.” Analysts understand
that although he was referring to previous governments,
it is obvious that he was expressing his concern towards
the current administration, which relies on a higher oil
income, but whose social programs are not accompanied by
efficient development policies. “When the oil boom was
over, the State suddenly found itself without necessary
funds to continue subsidizing the economy.” “Our
socialist ideal should and must avoid these mistakes,”
Baduel concluded before an awed audience. This speech
has had special importance because it is known that
within the core of the National Armed Forces it has been
made clear that Baduel spoke in representation and with
previous consultation of important groups of
professional officers, who are dissatisfied with the
autocratic neo-communism and populist turn which Chávez
is taking within the administration.
In Latin American history it has been the armed forces
who determine political changes, generally when they
perceive that the fall or implosion of their own regime
or of that which they support, is inevitable. Martial
intervention in these crisis almost always derives
towards new forms of tyranny, and in occasions leads the
way to democratic paths, granting the civil sector
participation or even leading roles. What will happen in
Venezuela? In his Lessons on the Philosophy of
History, Hegel declined from responding regarding
the future of the USA, alleging that he was a
philosopher and not a prophet. Weber, also, when
interrogated regarding the future of Germany, said that
teaching was not a prophet activity. And Norberto Bobbio,
in the Future of Democracy, affirms that “to
the question of whether democracy has a future, and
which that may be, supposing there is one, I calmly
answer that I don’t know.” However, Bobbio points
out that a civilized system of coexistence requires
tolerance, not violence, free debate of ideas and
agreement with regards to a common destiny. In
Venezuela Today, we supply information so that
it may be analyzed and interpreted.
|