|
September
29th., 2008
Concerns Regarding November 23
The voyage through Beijing, Moscow,
Paris, Lisbon ended up as usual, in Havana. According
to Cubadebate, the meeting with Fidel and Raúl
Castro was prolonged for two and a half hours. Fidel
ratified his “Reflexiones” (thoughts) of the
previous Friday, wherein he alleges that Chávez´
Socialism is the exact answer to Capitalism. “Chávez
makes correct and efficient use of the real power that
means to own the major oil reserves in the
world…Imperialism tries to eliminate him at any price,
without considering that his death would constitute a
catastrophe for Venezuela and for the governments of
Latin America and the Caribbean”. He requested him to
concentrate the resources to the max “in the internal
battle he is fighting against the media offensive and
the conditioned reflexes planted by Imperialism”. This
battle, from now until November 23, is of great
transcendence and we must triumph, as emphasized
by Castro. In the event of the initiation of the PSUV
campaign Chávez made reference to his meeting with
Castro. He presented his candidates for Governors and
Mayors, whom he requested to impose themselves in a way
overwhelming. “It is fundamental that the opposition
not occupy one single position. We must achieve a
resounding, splendorous triumph so that I, a humble
soldier, may accelerate the revolution. The total
victory on November 23 will allow Socialism to be
implanted”. Fidel would have explained to him the
battle against the “conditioned reflexes”. It is the
battle to impose the ideology, the revolutionary
conscience, to profoundly know the theory that orients
action, and for such purpose you must study Marx and
Engels, Lenin and Mao, and the authors that hold the
ideology to the objective current conditions, to the XXI
Century Socialism.
The ones who comment on the speech
are wondering how may Chávez´ candidates win, when the
surveys, including the government ones, coincide in that
the majority thinks that the Socialist economy does not
work, that its policies are not efficient upon inflation
and unemployment, that it is contrary to the national
interest to give away thousands of millions to friend
countries, that those resources should be invested in
Venezuela, that not enough has been made to alleviate
general poverty, that the government’s handling of
crime is terrible, that they are not in agreement with
the arms race, nor with the Russian bases, or with the
systematic preaching of hate and confrontation…They
observe that the strategy of turning the elections into
a plebiscite plays against Chávez since the majority
makes him responsible of the unsatisfied needs. They
add that the pro Chávez party is very fractured, as
acknowledged by Chávez in his speech, and the opposition
presents unitary candidates in almost the totality of
the districts. A commentator pointed out that the US
considers that they can face the financial crisis with
US$ 700,000 Million and Chávez, in 9 years, has
administered US$ 812,000 Million. As per the criteria
of our analysts, sooner or later, the 27 Million
Venezuelans will reach the conviction that given such
substantial resources, administered with good sense,
should have placed the country at the head of Latin
America, towards development with equity, conditions and
quality of life.
NO RUMBA OR CHA CHA CHA,
REVOLUTION
Chávez is folkloric, very Caribbean,
“he brings to our imagination a Rumba o a cha, cha,
cha”, stated Antoine Blanca, upon being consulted of the
new visit from Chávez to Paris to sign strategic
agreements with “his good friend”, Sarkozy and to give
guarantees of the oil activities of Total in
Venezuela. Blanca used to be a traveling Ambassador for
Latin America. Given his condition as an expert in
Latin American issues, the French diplomat probably
included within his judgment, Chávez’ scatological order
wherein the US Ambassador had 72 hours to leave the
country, the violent expulsion of José Manuel Vivanco,
director of Human Rights Watch (HRW), the threat to
declare the Papal Nuncio as persona non grata (an
unwelcome person) for having granted asylum to Nixon
Moreno, an emblematic student leader, an opposer to the
regime, and as of elemental logic, he would have read
front news of the Paris press that informed of the
previous itinerary: Havana: to attest once more the
absolute identification with Fidel; Beijing: to
negotiate the acquisition of arms on credit guaranteed
by oil, and Moscow, in similar negotiations, without
loosing the opportunity to ratify unconditional support
to Russia in the conflict with Georgia. Possibly,
Ambassador Blanca is kept up to date regarding Venezuela
reading Le Monde Diplomatique, the newspaper by
Ignacio Ramonet, who alleges that Chávez, by way of 27
Law-Decrees, was able to transform the country in a
“model of what the XXI Century Socialism should be”.
The doubt from Monsier Blanca is regarding the musical
sounds that allow him to characterize Chávez: rumba or
cha cha cha. Hours after Blanca´s declarations, the
President, from Lisbon, gave him a contribution to his
job as an analyst. “The majority of the European
leaders have no exact idea of what is going on in
Venezuela. In Europe they don’t understand the
Revolution”. (Efe)
Jorge Castañeda, ex Mexican
Chancellor and professor in Latin American studies of
the New York University, assures that he is up to date
in the Venezuelan reality. He writes that Chávez has
just received a demolishing blow with the HRW report,
A Decade of Chávez. “Finally, a serious,
independent and credited organization turns to the issue
of human rights in Venezuela, and issues an opinion that
is backed up and that lacks stridencies or
exaggerations”. The report surfaces that Chávez´
performance has been characterized by intolerance and
political discrimination, violation of human rights and
civil liberties, government control of the judicial
power, violation of union rights, harassment of the
civil society, systematic denounces of conspirators and
those in favor of a coup, against his opposers,
harassment of the media and lack of respect to the
liberty of expression. Vivanco, hours after having
presented his report, was seized in his hotel, he was
deprived of any communicated, taken by force to the
airport, and placed in a plane that left for Brazil.
Chávez revealed that it was he, himself, who had given
the order. Vivanco declared that what had happened
should be useful for the civilized world “to start
turning the reflector lights towards Venezuela”.
According to the government, the measure was an act of
sovereignty, adding that the HRW defends and stimulates
drug consumption.
Vivanco´s expulsion was repudiated
by governments and instances that are kept very sensible
to the human rights situation. They consider, in
general, that what was warned in the report confirmed
itself: political intolerance and restriction to
liberty of expression. The regime replied that for the
people it is more important what the Revolution offers:
food, jobs and participative democracy than an alleged
liberty of expression that is only good for the
conspiring bourgeoisie.
DOES CHÁVEZ BENEFIT FROM DRUG
DEALING?
90% of Venezuelans considers that
drug dealing is not a concern for the government. The
information appears in the surveys and explains the
insensibility upon the inclusion of three of the
Military closest to Chávez in the List of Drug
Dealers Specially Designated (SDNTK): Rodríguez
Chacín, ex Minister of the Interior, Hugo Carvajal, Head
of Military Intelligence (DGIM), and Henry Rangel,
Director of the Political Police (DISIP). In any other
country, a major scandal would have occurred, social
commotion and feverish judicial activity. Here, it
became part of everyday life. For the government, the
measure taken by the Treasury Department of the US,
through the Office for the Control of Foreign Assets (OFAC),
is another aggression against the Revolution, and as
such it deserves no credit. Spokespeople for the
opposition and several communication means claimed for a
serious investigation, given the graveness of the
event. As a response, the claimants were declared as
accomplices in the “assassination of the President”
which occupies the Agenda of the National Assembly
(AN). A Colombian newspaper made reference to a novel
by García Márquez: Chronicles of an announced death.
For the Colombian press, the links of the three
characters from the Chávez regime with drug dealing was
no news. The rescue of Clara Rojas was filmed by
Telesur and you can clearly hear the words of
comradeship and encouragement that Rodríguez Chacín,
duly commissioned by Chávez for this task, expressed to
the FARC commandos that delivered the ones kidnapped.
In the video wherein alias Timoshenko informed of the
death of Marulanda, he was also filmed by Telesur in a
farm of Rodríguez Chacín in Barinas.
The magazine Semana published
an article with declarations of an active officer of the
National Guard, who reveals to have witnessed a meeting
of General Carvajal with German Briceño, brother of the
Mono Jojoy, wherein Briceño requested and obtained
identity documents and credentials as members of the
Disip or the Dgim for a group of guerrilla that operate
in Venezuelan territory. The magazine had access to a
recording in which Carvajal alerts a group of drug
dealers and frustrates an operation to seize 2,900 kilos
of cocaine that were hidden in Puerto La Cruz and which
were going to be exported to Europe. General Rangel is
Chávez´ man for the most compromising missions. In
Bogotá it is affirmed that Uribe gave Chávez a report
drafted by security agencies wherein the FARC control
80% of the net that is used in the fluvial corridors to
take the drugs towards Venezuela and abroad. Experts
affirm that the success of the Plan Colombia
determined the migration of the most important drug
dealers to Venezuela, where they operate freely and with
the complicity of the Military, who have constituted
their own business, the “Cartel of the Suns”, in
reference to their insignia as Generals. They coincide
in that the increase of violence and corruption have
been caused by the increase of drug dealing, already
turned into a colossal problem in the country.
According to the ex US Ambassador in Bogotá, Myles
Frechette, radars installed in places neighboring
Venezuela, intercepted planes that often take off from
government airports loaded with cocaine and destined to
various markets. “I don’t know if Chávez – he affirms-
is personally benefiting from drug dealing, but the fact
is that he allows it. The evidence is irrefutable”.
|