|
January 30th.,
2009
Chavez’ Campaign Style
A powerful
adversary surged against Chavez: The Students, who,
daily, and around the country hold demonstrations
against Chavez’ indefinite re election and that of all
other officers of electoral origin. Its most powerful
weapon is the peaceful character of the students’
mobilization and their claim to live in a country
wherein human rights are respected, specially the right
for a plural university, wherein all ideas may be
discussed with liberty and tolerance, without
pretensions to impose a sole thought. This is what is
affirmed by the National Parliament of Youth and
Students, recently organized with young ones of all the
country. Chavez’ reaction was an autobiographic
chapter: “I hereby order the Minister of Defense, the
Minister of the Interior and the Head of the
Metropolitan Police: give them gas, the real one,
the good one, and send them to jail. On the
contrary, I will deal (fire) with the responsible
Chiefs”. Military and police immediately complied with
the orders. A newspaper published a picture, on the
front page, of a student leaning against a wall, with
white hands up, terrorized, and in front of him, at only
a few meters, a police man was aiming him with a gun.
The police and military launch tear gas, the real one,
with mustard gas. They shoot plastic bullets which
frequently cause grave injuries to the demonstrators.
The most dangerous repressors are the “collective
works”, generally those riding motorcycles, comprised of
civilian paramilitary groups who undergo terrorist
acts. The new Metropolitan Mayor affirms that they were
part of his antecessor’s payroll, and that now they are
being paid by the Ministry of the Interior. Officers of
the Chacao and Baruta Mayors’ Offices were able to
detain “infraganti” two of the motorists committing acts
of violence, with a red uniform, and with criminal
records. They were put to the order of the District
Attorney’s Office, who immediately ordered their
freedom.
An independent newspaper reported
that in one sole day, several people were assassinated
on account of political reasons: in Valencia, a
journalist from the opposition; in Barinas, another
journalist from the opposition and in Caracas, a
teacher, apparently for the same reasons, and
furthermore, four young demonstrators. Motorists, in
red shirts, lit up the car of the president of the
University Center Federation; they launched tear gas,
for the second time, to the house of Marcel Granier, a
directive of RCTV. For the sixth time, they did the
same thing against the Seat of the Nuncio, and their
protest has had no response on the part of the
government. The “collective works”, when they launch
the real bombs, they leave pamphlets, in order to
attest their authorship. On Tuesday, January 20, an
armed group, whose leader was pro Chavez, assaulted the
seat of the Ateneo, one of the institutions with the
highest prestige, wherein, apart from undergoing
cultural activities, it is the seat of NGO’s that defend
human rights. The attack was extended to the Museum of
Natural Sciences, wherein they caused damages, stole
purses and cellular phones, and all this in before the
indifference of police picketing close by. With the
same use of the real bombs, the students were
prevented from arriving to the Supreme Court of Justice,
wherein they proposed to submit a Constitutional appeal
for the right to vote. Chavez affirmed that the
demonstrators were small groups, not at all important,
“bourgeoisies and pitiyanquis” that want to de stabilize
the country, stimulated and financed by the US Embassy.
HE THREATENS WITH WAR IF THE
OPPOSITION WINS
To maintain Venezuelans in a state of
permanent tension has always been Chavez’ policy.
Analysts question what has led him to elevate the
current scenery of aggressiveness and violence. Every
day there are news regarding new events of disrespect;
launching of bombs in universities, use of tanks in the
University in Tachira, detention and trial of university
leaders. The answers to such questions are varied. For
some, it is about the rage produced by the civic
rebellion of the students. For others, fear of an
electoral defeat. Such a criteria would explain
exclusive dedication to the campaign and his imposition
that the Ministers do the same as well as the higher
ranking officers, and to extend the re election to other
positions of popular election. Chavez personally
assumed the direction of the campaign. Only a few deny
his condition of an autocrat, that he abuses the control
he holds over all the public powers, but he does it
without modesty. Those who sustain the opinion that he
fears a new defeat, are backed up by the December and
January surveys that gave the NO option a considerable
advantage. Others find that Chavez is conscious that
the bad image of the government affects his party men
and he tries to compact them with the argument that a
defeat would be the end of the regime, of the benefits
that they now enjoy. Recently, in the tour to Tachira,
he expressed: “If the opposition reaches power there
will be a war, since the people will not allow to be
stripped of what has been accomplished in ten years of
revolution”. He added that the Governor’s Offices won
by the opposition will “try to eliminate all current
programs, since they hate the people…to avoid that they
may suppress the social programs I have decided to
encourage the idea of an unlimited re election. When I
see all that they are doing, I say to myself, Uh Ah,
Chavez is not leaving”.
Imitating Fidel, he decided to write
a column, “Chavez’ lines”, which is published three
times a week. It is evident that at the end of the
campaign he wants to accentuate the polarization around
his personae. Luis Vicente Leon, a directive of
Datanalisis, believes that the display of Chavez’
campaign has been of such magnitude that it has dulled
the opposition, even if they hold a clear message
regarding the rejection of the indefinite re election,
in front of the overflow from the government, wherein
the lack of equilibrium on information reaches
inconceivable extremes, as well as the use of the
State’s resources and the control of the National
Electoral Council (NEC) regarding publicity to favor the
governments’ option. He advises the opposition to look
for alternative communication channels, since apart from
the fact that they lack economic resources, the NEC has
placed publicity for the government in the best hours
and Chavez, in three weeks, has made more than 40 acts
of propaganda using the State’s TV or national TV chains
of the radio electric means.
The Constitution provides for
impartiality and transparency of the electoral
entities. It prohibits government officials from any
activity oriented to induce voters, and likewise it
forbids them to use money or property from the State to
undergo electoral activities. The Suffrage Law
prohibits use of “symbols of the Nation, and of the name
or pictures of the Libertador”. Frequently you may see
the President dressed with the colors of the flag and
his campaign commando is called Simon Bolivar.
Political Parties and civilian organizations have gone
to the NEC and the Electoral Chamber requesting the
compliance of the legal order. In both entities, the
recourses have been denied, or declared without cause on
account of lack of evidence. A respectable Jurist
drafted a book regarding notorious and public facts
wherein Chavez has violated the Constitution and laws
regarding electoral matter. The chapters
dedicated to the referendum are bulky.
MILITARY, REFERENDUM AND
CONSTITUTION
The Military seem induced by Chavez
to constitute as important actors of the referendum.
The Plan Republica exists and empowers them to
collaborate in the electoral processes. The
International Observers have shown their surprise for
the military presence in an activity that corresponds
exclusively to civilians. The Director of the Tal
Cual newspaper, Teodoro Petkoff, has insisted in
that the Plan Republica must adjust to the functions
inherent to it. In a press conference called by the
Vice President of the Republic, accompanied by high
ranking officers, the Head of the Plan Republica,
General Gonzalez Gonzalez gave a press conference from
the Presidential Palace and in a rude tone he rejected
the declarations by Petkoff, for having “disqualified”
the Armed Forces. The Vice President, Colonel
Carrizales, stated that the Military “are very clear on
what is their role in the Bolivarian Revolution” and
Gonzalez qualified Petkoff of being “a liar, a traitor,
and an extortionist”. He emphasized that it is the
President who must give the action lines to the Plan
Republica, “and he does so very clearly”.
Petkoff wrote and editorial that was
the talk of the town all week, telling Gonzalez that “he
would not follow his example, disqualifying and
insulting, qualifying his newspaper as a little paper
and pamphlet”. He added that “such pamphlet”,
curiously, made them honor it with a press conference
from Miraflores in which the Head of the Plan Republica
appeared accompanied by his higher ranking officers and
the Vice President. He pointed out that the Military
may not check the credentials of the members of the
voting tables and the witnesses since that is not a
function of the Plan Republica, as sustained by
Gonzalez, but exclusively of civil personnel that has
been designated for such purposes.
He ratified that in the former
elections, there were cases wherein at the time of
closing, electoral tables had been obliged to stay open
so that groups of voters were transported by government
vehicles by party people from the PSUV, and that in some
cases, it was military officers who were empowered to
extend the voting event. That there were also cases
wherein several military tried, and some times
succeeded, to open the tables that had already closed so
that people brought by the government were able to
vote. Petkoff affirms that to point out such
irregularities does not constitute “an attack” to the
Armed Forces, but a contribution so that the Military do
not undertake, in electoral events, functions that are
forbidden to them by the Constitution. “Finally, he
requests General Gonzalez to show which article of the
Constitution states that the Armed Forces is at the
service of the Revolution”, as he claimed in the press
conference. “Excuse me, but Article 328 of the
Constitution states the following: the Armed Forces
constitutes an institution, essentially professional,
without political militancy. Within the compliance of
its functions, it is at the exclusive service of the
Nation and in no case to the service of any one person
or any political partiality”. Petkoff’s affirmations
have been a matter of permanent questioning and
recourses before the National Electoral Council. Its
President called for a press conference “to affront the
perverse matrix” that according to her, some means of
communication have been generating against the Electoral
entity. She defended the Plan Republica, of whom she
assured “defends with dignity the security of the
election centers”. Inspiring herself in Chavez’ words,
she assured that “the February 15 referendum will allow,
once more, to demonstrate the world that the Venezuelan
electoral system is an example of impartiality, accuracy
and transparency”.
|